The first blog I choose was Logan’s blog. It was informal and well written, kind of like editorial articles written in newspapers.There was also a lot of information within the blogs, including links from a variety of sources. This style of writing made for a quick read that was also interesting.
Next, I looked at Dani’s blog. Well, her blog only has one actual entry and some of the links were not embedded. Though, the writing did have a nice flow to it. It might be a good idea if Dani kept up on her entries…
Tory’s latest blog entry grabbed me from the first sentence. It made me want to read more. The entry was well laid out and had a good story behind it. Reading an entry about something within the media concerning Christianity was a nice change to what the media usually prefers to say about Christians.
The fourth blog I critiqued was Aihelya’s. Her subjects were very good and not ones found in an average high schooler’s blog. The articles written on Islam and Christianity were very informative, but I found that they were just informative. There was not really an argument for or against one or the other.
The last blog I read was Megan’s. I found her entries on the Proposition’s well thought out and full of information. They showed the good and bad sides of the propositions. Of the proposition blogs, they had an opinion about whether or not that proposition would be a good choice or not.
0 responses so far ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.
Leave a Comment